Gartner 2026: Top 10 Tech Trends for Business

(Discover many other contents on: NOWO.ONE)

I remember opening the Gartner report on December 19, 2025, with a coffee in one hand and a to-do list in the other. The headline felt like a holiday present — crisp, useful, and slightly unnerving. In this piece I walk through the Top 10 strategic technology trends for 2026, explain the three big priorities Gartner outlined (The Architect, The Synthesist, The Vanguard), and translate the implications into practical steps I recommend to the organizations I advise.

Executive snapshot: The three strategic priorities

In Gartner’s Top 10 Technology Trends for 2026 (dated December 19, 2025), I see a clear message for leaders tracking Strategic technology trends 2026: before we chase every new tool, we need to align on three priorities that make Enterprise technology adoption safer, faster, and repeatable. Gartner emphasizes architecture, integration, and governance as the foundation for 2026—and in my work, these pillars show up in every industry, from healthcare to finance and biotech.

Elena Rossi, Head of Research, CSMT: “These three priorities helped us reframe client roadmaps in late 2025 — it’s about structure, synthesis and stewardship.”

The Architect — build scalable, secure, AI-ready foundations

I treat “The Architect” as the work that makes everything else possible: modern platforms, clean interfaces, and security-by-design. This is where teams prepare for AI-native development platforms, AI supercomputing platforms, and confidential computing—without breaking existing systems. If the base is weak, every AI project becomes a one-off.

The Synthesist — integrate agents, models, and intelligent automation

“The Synthesist” is about making AI real in daily operations. I map where multiagent systems, domain-specific language models (DSLMs), and automation can plug into workflows—procurement, customer service, lab operations, fraud checks—then define how data and decisions move end to end. Integration is the difference between pilots and outcomes.

The Vanguard — strengthen governance, security, and Digital trust

“The Vanguard” is the guardrail layer: AI security platforms, preemptive cybersecurity, digital provenance, and geopatriation choices that reduce regulatory and geopolitical risk. This is where Digital trust becomes measurable: who approved the model, what data trained it, and how outputs are traced.

Why these priorities matter

My quick read: speed without trust is brittle at scale. The faster we deploy AI, the more we need proof, controls, and resilience built in.

A rapid checklist I use when consulting

• Architecture review: platforms, identity, data flows, and “AI-ready” gaps

• Model inventory: what models/agents exist, where they run, and who owns them

• Governance scorecard: security, provenance, compliance, and escalation paths

Infrastructure evolution: AI supercomputing & hybrid architectures

In Gartner’s 2026 outlook, I see infrastructure moving from “bigger cloud bills” to smarter Infrastructure strategies built for AI at scale. The pressure is simple: models are larger, data is heavier, and business teams want answers now—not next week.

AI supercomputing platforms: the new baseline for serious AI

AI supercomputing platforms combine CPUs, GPUs, AI accelerators, and emerging chips so companies can process massive model workloads faster and more efficiently. This matters most for large, vertical models and advanced MLOps, where training, fine-tuning, and inference compete for the same compute pool.

One real-world win I keep hearing: drug modeling timelines shrinking from years to weeks using AI supercomputing platforms, because teams can run more simulations, faster, with tighter feedback loops.

Marco Bellini, Director of Infrastructure, CSMT: “We saw clients shorten complex simulations from months to days once hybrid supercomputing was in place.”

Hybrid computing architectures: cloud elasticity, on-prem consistency, edge immediacy

Organizations are shifting to Hybrid computing architectures for elasticity, consistency, and immediacy. Cloud still wins for burst capacity and rapid experiments. On-premises remains key for predictable performance, data control, and stable unit economics. Edge is where latency-sensitive apps live—factories, retail, logistics, and connected devices.

Gartner’s signal is strong: by 2028, >40% of leading enterprises will rely on hybrid computing architectures, up from 8% today.

Token economics: cheaper per token, bigger total spend

Token costs have dropped 280-fold in two years, yet overall spend can still explode as usage grows. I’m seeing reports of monthly AI bills in the tens of millions, especially when inference is always-on.

Action items I recommend

1. Audit workloads: training vs inference vs analytics; identify peak demand.

2. Map latency-sensitive apps to edge/on-prem; keep bursty work in cloud.

3. Plan procurement for GPUs and accelerators, plus interconnect and power.

4. Create an infrastructure runway plan: capacity, resilience, and provider balance.

Security frontiers: Preemptive cybersecurity & Confidential computing

In Gartner’s 2026 outlook, security is no longer just about reacting fast. I’m seeing a clear push toward predicting attacks and protecting data even while it is being processed—two moves that strengthen digital trust in an AI-driven business world.

Preemptive cybersecurity: stopping threats before damage

Preemptive cybersecurity uses AI to spot weak signals—odd identity behavior, unusual API calls, risky device posture—and to act before an incident spreads. This shifts investment from “detect and respond” to “predict and prevent.” Gartner’s direction is bold: by 2030, preemptive cybersecurity may account for nearly half of security spending. That tells me budgets will move toward automation, analytics, and faster decision loops inside SecOps.

Confidential computing: protecting data while it’s in use

Confidential computing protects data during processing, not only at rest or in transit. It relies on Trusted execution environments (TEEs) that isolate workloads in hardware-based enclaves, helping keep data hidden even from cloud providers or infrastructure owners. Gartner expects rapid adoption: by 2029, more than 75% of operations processed in untrusted infrastructure will be secured with confidential computing. This is a major change for regulated workloads, cross-company analytics, and AI training on sensitive data.

Anna Greco, Chief Security Officer, CSMT: “Confidential computing changes the rules: data can be processed securely even outside a company's perimeter.”

Tech to watch in 2026 security programs

• AI-powered SecOps for faster triage and automated containment

• Deception tooling to lure attackers and expose tactics early

• Programmatic denial to reduce attack paths through policy-as-code

• Hardware-based enclaves built on TEEs for confidential workloads

Practical steps I recommend to clients now

1. Run threat prediction pilots on one high-value process (identity, email, or APIs).

2. Build a confidential computing proof-of-concept for a sensitive workload in the cloud.

3. Plan security ops retraining so teams can tune AI-driven controls and validate TEE deployments.

Models and agents: DSLMs, multiagent systems and AI-native development

Domain-specific language models for higher accuracy

In Gartner’s 2026 trend list, Domain-specific language models (DSLMs) stand out because they trade broad coverage for precision. In finance, healthcare, and legal work, that matters: the language is dense, the stakes are high, and “almost right” is still wrong. Research and early enterprise results keep pointing the same way: vertical models can deliver higher accuracy because they learn the patterns, terms, and edge cases of one domain.

I’ve seen pilot projects where a DSLM reduced false positives in clinical NLP by a large margin, simply because it handled abbreviations and context that general models kept misreading.

Multiagent systems to automate workflows end-to-end

Multiagent systems are central to Gartner’s “Synthesist” priority: instead of one model doing everything, you coordinate specialized agents—one to retrieve policies, one to draft, one to validate, one to route approvals. The big shift is operational: multiagent coordination enables workflow automation across steps that used to require handoffs between teams and tools.

• Planner agent breaks a request into tasks

• Domain agent applies DSLM reasoning for accuracy

• Verifier agent checks citations, rules, and thresholds

• Action agent updates systems (tickets, ERP, CRM)

AI native development platforms change how teams ship software

AI native development platforms are pushing software delivery toward smaller, AI-augmented teams. I’m seeing the same pattern: coding gets faster, but integration and controls become the real work. As Luca Moretti, Head of AI Practice at CSMT, puts it:

“When teams adopt AI-native tools, the bottleneck shifts from code to data and governance.”

Integration tip: registries, provenance, and lifecycle controls

As token costs fluctuate, DSLM usage needs active cost governance (routing, caching, and “small model first” patterns). My practical baseline is to treat models and agents like products, with traceability built in.

• Maintain a model registry (versions, owners, evaluation results)

• Store provenance metadata for training data and outputs

• Enforce validation and monitoring (drift, bias, failure modes)

Hybrid infrastructure also helps: keep sensitive inference close to data, while scaling training where compute is cheaper—without losing lineage.

Physical AI: Robots, drones and embodied intelligence

In Gartner’s 2026 list, Physical AI is where intelligence leaves the screen and moves into bodies: robots, drones, and autonomous devices that sense, decide, and act in the real world. I’m seeing this shift fast because the business case is clear: more throughput, fewer errors, and safer operations—if we design it right.

Real-world applications powered by AI machine learning

The most common Real-world applications I track are in logistics, inspection, delivery, and manufacturing. In pilot deployments, autonomous warehouse robots have shown about a ~10% efficiency improvement by reducing travel time and smoothing pick routes. That gain sounds small until you map it to labor hours, service levels, and peak-season stress.

Why edge compute and real-time inference matter

Physical AI cannot wait for cloud round-trips. Low-latency decisions—avoid a forklift, stabilize a drone, stop a cobot—need edge compute and real-time inference. In practice, I see hybrid setups: models trained centrally, then deployed at the edge with tight monitoring and update control.

Safety, regulation, and digital trust are non-negotiable

Once embodied systems operate near people and public spaces, safety and regulation become part of the product. That includes fail-safe behavior, audit logs, and provenance of sensor data so teams can prove what the robot “saw” and why it acted.

Giulia Romano, Head of Robotics, CSMT Innovation Hub: "Physical AI forces companies to integrate mechanics, software, and governance — it's an organizational challenge as much as a technical one."

What I learned from a client pilot: pilot, scale, secure

In one warehouse pilot, a robot cut pick-and-pack cycle time, but it also exposed integration gaps: messy location data, weak Wi‑Fi zones, and unclear handoffs between OT, IT, and AI teams. My roadmap is simple:

1. Pilot: start with one flow, clear KPIs, and safety tests.

2. Scale: standardize maps, APIs, and edge deployment.

3. Secure: lock down updates, validate sensor inputs, and document compliance.

Trust and traceability: Digital provenance & AI security platforms

In Gartner’s 2026 view, the Vanguard priority is where many leaders will feel the pressure first: proving Digital trust in AI-driven operations. I see the same pattern in the field—once AI touches regulated decisions, “we think it’s fine” is no longer acceptable. We need evidence.

Digital provenance: the integrity layer for AI code, data, and content

Digital provenance tools are built to track where AI assets come from and how they change over time—code, datasets, prompts, model weights, and even generated content. Traceability is not paperwork; it is how we show integrity and reduce risk when models support credit decisions, claims processing, or clinical workflows.

Federico Bianchi, Governance Lead, CSMT: "Provenance is the audit trail that transforms AI from a black box into a governed component of business processes."

I often insist on model provenance as the first line of defense for compliance and auditability. Provenance feeds governance: lineage, training data metadata, and versioning make decisions explainable after the fact—especially when auditors ask “which model, trained on what, deployed when?”

AI security platforms: integrated defenses, not scattered tools

AI security platforms bring multiple controls into one place: model security, data protection, and runtime defenses. This matters because attacks now target the full AI stack—poisoned data, prompt injection, model theft, and unsafe outputs. Integrated security also links naturally to Gartner’s push for preemptive cybersecurity, where we detect and stop issues earlier, not after damage.

High-stakes workflows: tamper-evident logs and tokenized proofs

For finance and healthcare, I recommend tamper-evident controls that can stand up in disputes:

• Immutable logs for training, evaluation, approvals, and deployments

• Tokenized proofs to verify key artifacts (datasets, model versions, outputs)

• Policy enforcement so only approved models can run in production

Practical step: pilot before you scale

1. Pick one high-impact workflow (e.g., loan pre-approval or triage support).

2. Instrument it with provenance: lineage, metadata, and versioning.

3. Validate with security and compliance, then enforce across similar workflows.

Geopatriation and data sovereignty: Where to put workloads

In Gartner’s 2026 list, Geopatriation stands out because it forces a simple but urgent question: where should workloads live when laws, borders, and politics can change faster than our architectures? Geopatriation means moving data and systems to sovereign infrastructures to reduce Geopolitical risks and improve legal defensibility.

Data sovereignty changes workload placement

Data sovereignty is not only a legal topic; it is an engineering constraint. It affects hybrid strategies, vendor selection, and even how we design apps. I’m seeing more organizations rebalance workload location to mitigate regulatory and geopolitical risk while preserving performance—especially for latency-sensitive services and AI pipelines that cannot afford slow cross-border transfers.

How I advise clients to decide what to repatriate

Before moving anything, I’ve advised clients to map data flows and classify workloads. This avoids costly “lift-and-shift” moves that do not reduce risk.

1. Map where data is created, processed, stored, and backed up.

2. Classify datasets (PII, regulated, IP, operational telemetry).

3. Score each workload on regulatory risk, performance needs, and cost.

Practical tactic: a “sovereignty-first” filter

I apply a sovereignty-first filter to workloads handling PII or regulated datasets (health, finance, critical infrastructure). If the answer is “yes, sovereignty required,” then we design around local control first, and optimize cost second.

if workload.handles_PII or workload.is_regulated: place = "sovereign region / sovereign cloud" else: place = "global cloud region (best fit)"

Cloud providers: local regions, contracts, and controls

Many Cloud providers now offer local-region options, sovereign cloud programs, and customer-managed keys. In planning, I look beyond the region label: who operates it, who can access it, and what audit evidence we can produce.

Marco Bellini, Director of Infrastructure, CSMT: "We help companies decide which workloads truly need sovereign hosting versus those that can remain on global cloud platforms."

Business impact is clear: repatriation can increase cost, but it can also reduce legal exposure and Geopolitical risks while keeping critical operations stable.

How I translate trends into action: a pragmatic business roadmap

When I read Gartner’s 2026 tech trends, I don’t start with the buzzwords. I start with Business transformation and what must change on Monday morning: processes, data flows, risk exposure, and the skills on the floor. At CSMT Innovation Hub—a non-partisan consortium in Brescia active for almost twenty years—we use a staged approach to turn strategy into outcomes: analyze, pilot, govern, scale.

Step 1: Operational analysis (CSMT-style intake)

I map priorities, pain points, and quick wins with a short, structured intake across IT, operations, quality, and compliance. The goal is Operational excellence: fewer manual steps, fewer incidents, faster decisions.

Elena Rossi, Head of Research, CSMT: “Our work begins with operational analysis — it's the most consistent predictor of successful scaling.”

Step 2: Pilot projects with measurable KPIs

I pick one trend and design a pilot that can be measured in weeks, not quarters. Example: a confidential computing pilot to protect sensitive production or customer data while it is processed.

• KPIs: time-to-process, number of exposed datasets, audit findings, cost per workload.

• Scope: one application, one dataset, one team.

In Brescia, I’ve seen a single security pilot unlock wider adoption: once the plant manager saw fewer access exceptions and faster approvals, the same pattern was reused for AI workloads.

Step 3: Build governance early (provenance + security)

Before scaling, I set baselines for digital provenance, AI security, and staffing. That includes model access rules, logging, and budget ownership.

baseline = {identity, encryption, logging, model_registry, incident_playbook}

Step 4: Scale with hybrid infrastructure and model registries

Scaling usually means hybrid: on-prem for latency and sovereignty, cloud for burst capacity. I plan for costs to evolve as usage grows, and I formalize a model registry for DSLMs and agent workflows.

Step 5: Communicate ROI and risk in plain language

I brief stakeholders with two narratives: ROI (hours saved, scrap reduced, cycle time improved) and risk (compliance, geopatriation exposure, security posture). Where possible, I align pilots with calls for proposals and grants to reduce upfront spend.

Wild cards, analogies and the curious corners of 2026

As I close this look at Strategic technology trends 2026, I keep coming back to one habit that separates calm leaders from reactive ones: wild card thinking. It helps surface governance gaps and prepares us for uncommon but plausible events—especially now, when AI-native platforms, multiagent systems, and digital provenance are moving faster than most policies.

Wild card #1: the contract that negotiates itself

Imagine a multiagent system negotiating a supply contract in real time: a procurement agent pushes price and delivery, a compliance agent checks sanctions and geopatriation rules, and a legal agent redlines clauses on the fly. It sounds like pure Technology innovation—until the board asks who is accountable when the agent accepts a risky indemnity term at 2:13 a.m. This is where Threat prediction becomes more than cyber: it’s predicting process failure, audit exposure, and reputational damage.

Wild card #2: the hospital model that must move home

Now picture a local hospital running a DSLM for diagnostics. It performs well, but a new regulation forces repatriation: the model, logs, and patient data must move to sovereign infrastructure. Overnight, geopatriation stops being a cloud preference and becomes a patient-safety and continuity issue. Confidential computing and AI security platforms suddenly look less “optional” and more like the only way to keep care running while staying compliant.

Analogy: your tech stack is a city

I explain 2026 trade-offs like this: infrastructure is the roads, models are the public services, and governance is law enforcement. If roads are weak, services fail. If law enforcement is missing, the city still runs—until it doesn’t. Digital provenance is the city’s chain of custody; preemptive cybersecurity is patrols guided by signals, not luck.

The boring math that can save millions

Token-cost math is dull but critical. Even with token costs dropping 280-fold in two years, spend can rise if usage explodes. A small prompt and routing tweak can cut calls, latency, and budget. I often show teams a simple reminder: cost = tokens_in + tokens_out multiplied by volume.

Federico Bianchi, Governance Lead, CSMT: "A tabletop scenario often wakes up decision makers faster than slides ever will."

So here’s my board-level scenario: “A multiagent system signs a contract, a regulator requests the decision trail, and we can’t prove which model version produced which clause.” If that makes the room quiet, good—run the tabletop exercise. And my informal aside: I keep a post-it that reads trust > speed when clients push for unchecked rollout.